Consortium Composition and Eligibility Conditions

Proposals must be submitted by a main applicant on behalf of a consortium, which must include at least a main applicant, a co-applicant, and a cooperation partner. Co-funders are optional.

Main Applicant

• Must hold a tenured position or a tenure track agreement at one of the following Dutch research organisations: universities, universities of applied sciences (UAS), university medical centres (UMC), KNAW or NWO institutes, TO2 institutes, National knowledge institutions (RKI, listed in Annex 7.3), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, ARCNL, or Princess Máxima Center.
• Researchers at UAS or TO2 institutes may also apply with a salaried position for a limited period.
• May submit only one proposal as main applicant and participate a maximum of one time as co-applicant in another consortium.
• For Phase 2, the main applicant (or their designated substitute) must have participated in both facilitating workshops.

Co-applicants

• Must have an active role in the project and at least a master's degree or equivalent qualification.
• Can be affiliated with the same types of Dutch research organisations as main applicants, foreign research organisations (subject to specific conditions and NWO review), or social organisations (under the de minimis regulation, with a maximum of €300,000 over three years).
• A co-applicant in Phase 1 can participate in up to two consortia.
• Foreign research organisations must meet specific criteria (e.g., public law body, primary goal of independent research, separate accounts for economic/non-economic activities) and undergo an NWO assessment based on submitted documents (e.g., Chamber of Commerce extract, articles of association, annual accounts, Research Organisation Declaration) at least 20 working days before the submission deadline.

Cooperation Partners

• Mandatory for all consortia.
• Must be actively involved throughout the project, from co-design to co-creation and knowledge utilisation.
• Include public and private organisations, and where relevant, citizens or their representation.
• No NWO funding may be requested for salary or research costs for personnel of cooperation partners. However, costs can be remunerated by hiring them as third parties via 'material costs', 'knowledge utilisation', or 'project management' modules.

Co-funders (Optional)

• Contribute to the project in cash and/or in kind and do not receive NWO funding.
• Co-funding from co-funders cannot exceed 50% of the total project costs.
• Organisations whose researchers are eligible as main applicants (Section 3.1) may not participate as co-funders, with an exception for TO2 institutes if they are not also a main or co-applicant in the same consortium.
• Co-funding declarations are compulsory annexes to the proposal.

Application and Assessment Procedure

The application process for the 'NWA Resilient Digital Ecosystems' call is structured in two phases, each with distinct steps for submission, evaluation, and selection. All applications must be submitted via the NWO web application ISAAC by the main applicant.

Phase 1 Procedure

• Matchmaking meeting: An optional event to facilitate consortium formation.
• Submission of the proposal: Main applicants submit their full proposals.
• Admissibility of the proposal: NWO checks against formal conditions.
• Pre-advice assessment committee: Committee members provide written, reasoned responses and numerical scores.
• Interview selection: If the number of admissible proposals exceeds three times the available grants, a selection of consortia will be invited for an interview.
• Interview: Consortia present their proposals and respond to committee questions.
• Assessment committee meeting: The committee makes its final assessment and recommendation.
• Decision-making: The NWO Executive Board makes the final funding decision.

Phase 2 Procedure

• Facilitating workshops: Mandatory for the main applicant of the Phase 2 project (or their designated substitute) to encourage collaboration among Phase 1 projects and develop the umbrella proposal.
• Submission of the proposal: The nominated grant administrator submits the umbrella project proposal.
• Admissibility of the proposal: NWO checks against formal conditions.
• Pre-advice assessment committee: Committee members provide written, reasoned responses and numerical scores.
• Interview selection: A selection of consortia may be invited for an interview.
• Interview: Consortia present their proposals and respond to committee questions.
• Assessment committee meeting: The committee makes its final assessment and recommendation.
• Recovery option: If the assessment committee advises against funding, the consortium may be given an opportunity to submit a revised proposal.
• Decision-making: The NWO Executive Board makes the final funding decision.

Post-Award Workflow

Grant recipients are subject to several obligations, including content monitoring by NWO and a supervisory committee, regular accountability and project completion reports. Mandatory programme activities include a kick-off workshop (within six months of project start), annual programme meetings, a midterm meeting, and a closing meeting. Awarded projects must also elaborate a data management section into a comprehensive data management plan, conclude a consortium agreement, and adhere to Open Access policies for scientific publications.

Timeline

Assessment Procedure and Criteria

The assessment procedure for the 'NWA Resilient Digital Ecosystems' call is conducted in two phases, with an assessment committee appointed by the NWO Executive Board. NWO is a signatory to DORA, meaning research is evaluated on its own merits, and applicants should not mention Journal Impact Factor or h-index.

Assessment Process

The procedure involves several steps:

1. Admissibility of the proposal: NWO checks applications against formal conditions (e.g., main/co-applicant eligibility, co-funder conditions, DORA compliance, submission via ISAAC, deadline, language, budget format, required annexes). Applicants may be given one opportunity to make administrative corrections within five working days.
2. Pre-advice assessment committee: Proposals are reviewed by several committee members (pre-advisers) who provide written, substantive feedback and assign a numerical score (1-9, 1=excellent, 9=unsatisfactory) per assessment criterion.
3. Interview selection (Phase 1 only): If the number of admissible proposals exceeds three times the number of projects that can be funded, only a selection of the highest-ranked proposals will be invited for an interview.
4. Interview: Consortia present their proposals and respond to questions from the assessment committee, allowing for rebuttal.
5. Assessment committee meeting: The committee makes its own assessment based on all available material and draws up a written recommendation to the NWO Executive Board.
6. Recovery option (Phase 2 only): If the assessment committee advises against approval, it may provide an explanation and suggest improvements. The consortium will have one opportunity (two or three months, depending on the nature of the improvements) to submit a revised proposal, followed by an interview.
7. Decision-making: The NWO Executive Board reviews the procedure and committee advice to make the final decision on awarding or rejecting proposals.

The assessment committee has a broad composition, including scientific expertise, knowledge chain expertise, and societal stakeholders. NWO has opted to assess all applications without involving external referees.

Assessment Criteria and Thresholds

Applications are substantially assessed based on the following weighted criteria:

1. Problem definition and analysis (20%)
   • Clearly formulated problem definition and knowledge gaps, logically related and contributing to the call's objective.
   • Societal and scientific urgency and relevance.
   • Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary character.
   • Additional for Phase 2: Outlines how the umbrella project focuses on applying results across different sectors.
2. Envisaged impact and route to impact (20%)
   • Clearly defined scientific and societal impact, logically following from the problem. Consideration of unwanted impact and mitigation measures.
   • Clear Impact pathway describing the route to societal impact and partner roles.
   • Appropriate strategic activities (stakeholder engagement, communication, monitoring, evaluation, capacity development).
   • Sufficient attention to key risks of undesirable societal impact and proposed measures.
3. Quality of the consortium (30%)
   • Logical fit of consortium composition with the project: interdisciplinary, involvement of relevant societal stakeholders/citizens, and wider knowledge chain.
   • Complementarity of partners in knowledge, skills, and expertise.
   • Active involvement of partners in co-design and co-creation.
   • Clear division of tasks, roles, and project governance.
   • Tangible and feasible plan for professional development of young and mid-career researchers.
   • Additional for Phase 2: Representation of each Phase 1 project in the consortium with relevant contributions.
4. Quality of the research (30%)
   • Scientific research question logically follows from problem analysis, original and innovative.
   • Proposed approach and methodology suitable for objectives and research question. Use of fundamental, applied, and practical research.
   • Integrated character of interdisciplinary research.
   • Structure of research plan: clearly defined, logically coherent work packages, suitable budget, risk analysis, back-up plan.

To be eligible for funding, a proposal must receive an overall qualification of at least 'very good' and at least the qualification 'good' for each individual assessment criterion.

Ex Aequo (Phase 1 only)

In case of an ex aequo situation (two or more proposals indistinguishable based on weighted score within 0.05 of the reference score), the tie-breaking mechanism is as follows:

1. The proposal with a better assessment for 'Alignment with the objectives of the programme' ranks highest.
2. If still tied, the proposal with the highest score for 'Quality of the consortium' ranks highest.
3. If still tied, the assessment committee determines the ranking via an (anonymous) majority vote.

Funding Model and Budget

The 'NWA Resilient Digital Ecosystems' call operates on a grant funding model provided by the Dutch Research Council (NWO). The total available budget for this call is €8,702,072.

• Phase 1: An amount of €7,500,000 is available for sector-specific research projects. A grant amount of at least €1,500,000 and at most €1,875,000 can be applied for per project. NWO expects to fund four or five applications in this phase.
• Phase 2: For the overarching connection project, €1,202,072 is available. Depending on the number of projects allocated in Phase 1, any remaining budget from Phase 1 will be added to the Phase 2 budget.

Budget Modules and Rates

Applicants can request funding for the following budget modules, with specific conditions and maximum amounts:

• Personnel: Funding for salary costs of personnel contributing to the project, including PhD students, Engineering Doctorates (EngD), postdocs, non-scientific personnel (NWP), and research leave for applicants. Rates are based on NWO salary tables (UNL, UMCNL) or the Government Tariff Manual (HOT). A one-off personal bench fee of €5,000 is available for each PhD student, EngD, or postdoc (if appointed for at least 12 months for 0.5 FTE). For personnel at foreign research organisations, a maximum of 25% of the total personnel grant amount can be requested, using UNL rates adjusted for country correction coefficients.
• Material: Covers all project-specific material costs, subject to a maximum of 25% of the NWO grant amount. Up to 50% of the material budget can be used for third-party work. For research organisations abroad, a maximum of 25% of the material budget can be requested.
• Investments: Funding for investments in equipment, infrastructure, and other research resources with economic value or reusability. A maximum of €500,000 can be applied for investments, which can only be made at research organisations listed in Section 3.1.
• Knowledge Utilisation: Mandatory module for activities promoting the use of knowledge to increase societal impact. A minimum of 5% and a maximum of 20% of the grant amount must be allocated to this module.
• Project Management: Mandatory module for project management costs. A maximum of 5% of the grant amount can be used in Phase 1 projects, and a maximum of 10% of the grant amount in Phase 2 projects. For personnel costs, a maximum rate of €121 per hour can be claimed.

Co-funding

Co-funding is not compulsory but is permitted. It can be provided in cash (net amount paid to the applicant) and/or in kind (capitalised personnel and/or material contributions). Co-funding from co-funders cannot exceed 50% of the total project costs. NWO is the main funder. Certain costs, such as NWO grants, contributions from parties eligible for NWO funding (with exceptions for TO2 institutes), and overheads, are not eligible as co-funding.

Payment Schedule and Accountability

NWO will provide information on interim reports and accountability during the project in the grant award letter. Final reports on content and finances are required upon project completion, after which the final funding amount will be determined.

Consortium Formation and Joint Activities

The NWA programme strongly encourages collaboration between researchers from different disciplines, knowledge organisations, and societal (public and private) organisations, including citizens. This approach is central to addressing complex issues and enhancing knowledge utilisation and societal impact.

Facilitated Collaboration

• Matchmaking Meeting (Phase 1): NWO organises a matchmaking meeting on 23 April 2026 to bring together potential applicants, researchers, cooperation partners, and stakeholders. Participation is optional but recommended for exchanging ideas and networking.
• Facilitating Workshops (Phase 2): For the umbrella project in Phase 2, NWO organises workshops in April and May 2029 to stimulate the development of the umbrella proposal and the formation of a broad consortium. Participation is mandatory for the main applicant of the Phase 2 project (or a designated substitute) and a delegation from each Phase 1 project. These workshops focus on project management, scaling up results, cross-cutting activities, knowledge utilisation, and overall project design.

Ongoing Collaboration and Monitoring

• Supervisory Committee: A supervisory committee will be appointed to monitor the connection between different themes, project progress, and results, with a focus on knowledge transfer, utilisation, and application. Representatives from all consortia will provide input and participate in its meetings.
• Programme Meetings: Consortia from the sector-specific projects and the umbrella project will consult at least annually at programme meetings, also attended by the supervisory committee, to foster mutual learning and coordination.
• Phase 2 Umbrella Project: This project is explicitly designed to generalise and upscale the results from Phase 1 projects, facilitating mutual learning across case studies and developing generic recommendations and guidelines for wider societal deployment.

The call emphasises that consortia should work in a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary way, connecting fundamental, applied, and practice-oriented research to meet the knowledge needs of social stakeholders.

Required Tasks and Programme Activities

Projects funded under this call are subject to several mandatory tasks and programme-level joint activities to ensure coherence, knowledge transfer, and impact generation.

Project Backbone and Management

• Impact Plan Approach: Consortia must draw up an Impact Plan with stakeholders as part of the proposal, describing how societal impact is expected to be realised and the role of productive interactions.
• Knowledge Security Declaration: The main applicant must submit a signed statement confirming the proposal's alignment with the research organisation's knowledge security policy and consultation with the responsible officer.
• Ethical Statement or Licence: Applicants are responsible for determining if an ethical statement or licence is needed and must obtain it from the relevant institution or ethics committee in time. A copy must be provided to NWO after award, before the relevant part of the project commences.
• Data Management Plan: After funding is awarded, the data management section from the proposal must be elaborated into a comprehensive Data Management Plan, describing how data will be made FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). Approval of this plan by NWO is a condition for disbursement of funding.
• Consortium Agreement: The conclusion of a consortium agreement is a mandatory condition for starting the project after funding is awarded. This agreement covers intellectual property, publication, knowledge transfer, confidentiality, co-financing, and reporting. NWO provides a model agreement.

Programme-Level Joint Activities

• Kick-off Workshop: Each awarded project must organise a kick-off workshop within six months of the project start, included in the proposed budget, to discuss planning, cooperation, and impact/communication plans.
• Programme Meetings: Consortia from Phase 1 projects and the Phase 2 umbrella project will consult at least once per year at programme meetings, also attended by the supervisory committee. NWO facilitates these meetings.
• Midterm Meeting: NWO facilitates a midterm meeting around the project's midpoint, focusing on evaluating the Impact pathway. It includes a public day with stakeholders.
• Closing Meeting: Towards the end of the project, NWO organises a public closing meeting with project stakeholders to discuss and secure project conclusions, insights, and impact.

Consortium Agreement

The 'Declaration co-funding' annex states that if the project proposal is awarded, co-funders commit to fulfil all obligations regarding a prompt conclusion of the consortium agreement, unless otherwise stipulated in the Call for proposals. This indicates that a consortium agreement, which typically addresses Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) among other aspects, is a mandatory requirement for granted projects.

Ethical Aspects

Section 7 of the proposal, 'Ethical aspects', requires applicants to check applicable boxes in a table regarding necessary approvals:

NWO must receive proof of any required ethical approval before your project can start.

Knowledge Security

The 'Declaration Knowledge Security' annex requires the main applicant to declare that the application has been drawn up in accordance with the knowledge security policy of their Organisation and that the officer responsible for knowledge security within the Organisation has been consulted for this purpose. This statement must be signed by the main applicant on the Dutch side and enclosed with the complete proposal, printed on the stationery of the research organisation.

Data Management Plan Questions

Section 6 of the proposal, 'Data management', requires applicants to answer the following questions. The evaluation of this section will not influence the assessment of the application, but feedback may be provided to assist in developing a data management plan if funding is awarded.

1. Will data that is collected or generated be suitable for reuse? (Applicants must indicate Yes/No and provide an explanation).
2. Where will the data be stored during the research?
3. How will the data be stored for the long term and made available for use by third parties when the project has been completed? For whom will the data be accessible?
4. What facilities (ICT, (secure) archive, refrigerators or legal expertise) do you anticipate will be needed for the storage of data during and after the research? Are they available?

ICT facilities for data storage are defined as resources such as data storage capacity, bandwidth for data transport, and computing power for data processing.

Consortium Dimensioning: Multi-Actor, Interdisciplinarity, and SSH

The 'NWA Resilient Digital Ecosystems' call places strong emphasis on collaborative and integrated research approaches, explicitly requiring multi-actor engagement and interdisciplinarity, with a clear expectation for the inclusion of SSH perspectives.

• Multi-Actor: REQUIRED
  The programme explicitly encourages knowledge-chain-wide and interdisciplinary consortia, where researchers from diverse disciplinary backgrounds, knowledge organisations, and societal (public and private) organisations, and where relevant, citizens, collaborate on complex issues. A consortium must consist of at least a main applicant, a co-applicant, and a cooperation partner. Cooperation partners are mandatory, ensuring active involvement from societal stakeholders from problem formulation to research implementation and knowledge utilisation. Societal organisations, society, and citizens are expected to have a clear role in the research.
• Interdisciplinarity / Transdisciplinarity: REQUIRED
  Consortia are required to work in a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary way. The evaluation criteria specifically assess the 'Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary character of the problem definition and the knowledge gaps' and the 'Integrated character of the interdisciplinary research'. This ensures that research approaches combine insights and methods from various disciplines to address the complex nature of digital ecosystem resilience.
• SSH (Social Sciences and Humanities): EXPECTED / INTEGRATED
  The call explicitly states that innovative insights are sought regarding sociotechnical factors, taking into account economic, ethical, social, and cultural considerations. Interventions and action perspectives can be of a technical nature but can also have an organisational, economic, social, political, legal, or ethical focus. The list of disciplines addressed includes business administration, communication science, economics, philosophy, psychology, law, and sociology, indicating a strong expectation for SSH integration to understand human behaviour, governance, and societal impacts within digital ecosystems.

Declarations and Statements Required for Submission

The following declarations and statements are integral to the application and project execution:

• NWA Declaration of support (without co-funding): The organisation declares to be fully informed, to have actively contributed, to endorse the proposal, and if awarded, to participate, contribute, and agree to be mentioned on the NWO website. This declaration applies during the NWO assessment process and for the duration of the project if granted.
• Declaration co-funding: Co-funders declare to have read and endorsed the proposal, to participate and contribute if awarded, to fulfil obligations regarding a prompt conclusion of the consortium agreement, and to agree to be mentioned on the NWO website. It specifies cash and/or in-kind co-funding amounts and notes that the valuation of in-kind contributions follows the rules set out in the Call for proposals and NWO Co-funding rules.
• Statement appointment and project supervision: This statement, to be provided on institutional letterhead, guarantees adequate project supervision for scientific staff for the entire project duration, even if the main applicant's employment contract ends before the project's intended completion date.
• Declaration Knowledge Security: The main applicant declares that the application complies with the organisation's knowledge security policy and that the responsible officer has been consulted. This statement must be signed by the main applicant (Dutch side) and enclosed with the complete proposal, printed on the research organisation's stationery.
• General de minimis statement: This statement requires the undertaking to declare any de minimis aid received in the 36 months prior to signing. The general de minimis regulation (EU) No. 2023/2831 sets a threshold of €300,000 per undertaking over a three-year period. Applicants must indicate if no aid has been granted, if aid has been granted but the threshold not exceeded (with total amount), or if other state aid for the same eligible costs has been received. Copies of documents pertaining to such grants must be attached. The explanation clarifies what constitutes an 'undertaking', how aid is calculated, and the implications of exceeding the threshold, including potential recovery of unlawful aid for ten years.

Project Monitoring and Evaluation

Section 4.3, 'Project governance and project management', requires applicants to describe how project progress will be monitored and feedback loops facilitated throughout the research execution. This includes specifying the timing, purpose, and type of activities for monitoring & evaluation and how these could lead to adjustments in the Impact Pathway. The involvement of an advisory committee in project governance is also mentioned.

Ethical Approval Pre-condition

NWO requires proof of any required ethical approval before your project can start, as stated in Section 7, 'Ethical aspects'.

Post-Award Compliance and Audit

The 'General de minimis statement' explains that the European Commission can recover unlawful aid for ten years after it has been granted. Consequently, the government agency that granted the aid may request documents to prove that the aid was spent on the activities for which it was granted, aligning with general administration and retention obligations for entrepreneurs.

General Application Rules

• All sections of the proposal application form must be written in English.
• Use the Calibri font at font size 10; do not change margins (2.5 cm, all directions) or spacing.
• Do not change the colours of the layout and headers provided.
• Do not add any hyperlinks.
• For sections 2 - 5, a page limit of 15 pages applies, including illustrations, figures, and descriptions of work packages.
• The page limit does not include the Annexes.
• An image may be included on the front page.
• Subheadings may be used, but the section numbering provided may not be altered.
• Footnotes are not permitted.
• Before converting to PDF, remove italicised instructions and grey text, and refresh the table of contents.
• Do not use any security locks or bookmarks in the PDF file.

Proposal Structure

The application form consists of 8 sections and 2 appendices:

1. General project information: Includes tables for main applicant, co-applicants, co-funders, cooperation partners, and a summary of the project budget.
2. Problem analysis and impact: Covers problem analysis, assumptions in the problem analysis, societal impact, and relationship with the Call for proposals theme.
3. Route to impact: Details outcomes, output, and assumptions in the Impact Pathway.
4. Consortium and productive interactions: Describes the consortium, planned productive interactions, and project governance/management.
5. Research plan: Outlines the overall research plan, work packages (including budget motivation), planning (Gantt chart), and risk management/contingency plan.
6. Data management: Requires answers to questions regarding data reusability, storage during and after research, and required facilities.
7. Ethical aspects: A table for checking required ethical approvals.
8. Literature references: A condensed list of relevant literature, patents, publications, and other output, with a maximum of 2 A4 pages. Numerical in-text citations are required.

Annexes

• A. Diagram Impact Pathway: A modifiable diagram including output, outcomes, and impact.
• B. Impact Pathway indicators: A table for formulating SMART indicators for Outcomes and Output.

General Project Information (Section 1 of Proposal)

Applicants must provide the following details:

• Title of the project (must match ISAAC entry).
• Main applicant and Co-applicants: First name, surname, title(s), Organisation, Appointment type, Position type, End date contract, Expertise.
• Co-funders: First name, surname, title(s), Organisation/host country, Type, Sector, Expertise.
• Cooperation partners: First name, surname, title(s), Organisation/host country, Type, Sector, Expertise.
• Summary of the project budget: Requested from NWO, cash contributions from co-funders, in-kind contributions from co-funders, and total project budget.

Required Declarations and Statements

Several annex documents serve as administrative forms requiring completion and signature:

• NWA Declaration of support (without co-funding): Requires Project title, Main applicant, Organisation name, Signature, Signature date, Name, Job title, Organisation, E-mail address, and Address. The organisation declares active contribution, endorsement, participation, and agreement to be mentioned on the NWO website.
• Declaration co-funding: Requires Project title, Main applicant, Organisation name, specified amounts for co-funding in cash and/or in kind (excl. VAT), a table for Specification of the in kind contribution (item/activity, price/hourly rate, number of hours, total €), Signature, Signature date, Name, Job title, Organisation, KvK organisation (if applicable), E-mail address, and Address. The co-funder declares endorsement, participation, fulfilment of consortium agreement obligations, and agreement to be mentioned on the NWO website.
• Statement appointment and project supervision: Must be copied onto institutional letterhead. Requires the name of the funding round, main applicant's name and title, application title, Signature, Name of head of department/faculty/division, Research organisation, and Place and date of signature. It includes a guarantee for adequate project supervision if the main applicant's contract ends early.
• Declaration Knowledge Security: Must be printed on the stationery of the main applicant's research organisation. Requires Project title, Main applicant, Organisation name, Signature, Signature date, Name, Job title, Organisation, E-mail address, and Address. The main applicant declares compliance with the organisation's knowledge security policy and consultation with the responsible officer.
• General de minimis statement: Requires the Name of the undertaking, Chamber of Commerce registration number, NACE classification, Officer name and position, Address of the undertaking, Postal code and city, and Date and signature. The undertaking declares whether it has received de minimis aid in the preceding 36 months, the total amount if applicable, and if other state aid for the same eligible costs has been received. Supporting documents for previous aid must be attached.

Project Budget Summary

The proposal form includes a summary table for the project budget in Section 1:

• Requested from NWO: Amount in €.
• Contributions co-funders (if applicable): Cash amount in €.
• Contributions co-funders (if applicable): In-kind amount in €.
• Total project budget: Amount in €.

Work Package Budgeting

Within Section 5.1, 'Research plan and work packages', applicants are required to list and explain specific expenses for each work package. This includes personnel, services, and materials. For each cost item, a single row in a table should provide a description and the amount. These amounts must correspond with information provided in a separate budget form (not explicitly included in this corpus). A total for all work package expenses, including all in-kind contributions, must be provided and motivated (maximum 150 words).

Co-funding Details

The 'Declaration co-funding' annex specifies that co-funding can be provided in cash and/or in kind, with amounts to be stated exclusive of VAT. For in-kind contributions, a table must be completed with the following columns:

The valuation of in-kind contributions (personnel and materials) must follow the rules set out in the Call for proposals and the NWO Co-funding rules.